Netflix says it ‘updated’ new password sharing policies that had users melting down

Netflix and chill (out), password sharers.

After intense backlash surrounding what appeared to be the first signs of the company’s upcoming password sharing crackdown, Netflix (NFLX) clarified no official announcements have been made outside of the current test countries.

“For a brief time last Tuesday, a help center article containing information that is only applicable to Chile, Costa Rica, and Peru, went live in other countries. We have since updated it,” a Netflix spokesperson told.

Last week’s updates appeared to show the company would require users to identify a “primary location” for all accounts that live within the same household. News which had users suggesting this would be a bridge too far, and threatening to leave the platform as a result.

Users would then need sign into the home Wi-Fi of the primary location at least once every 31 days to ensure their device is not blocked. Temporary codes would need to be used for traveling members, which would only remain valid for seven consecutive days

Netflix said it would use information such as IP addresses, device IDs, and account activity to determine whether a device signed into the account is connected to the primary location.

In a recent survey, investment firm Jefferies highlighted concerns surrounding the company’s crackdown on password sharing, particularly among the account freeloaders Netflix hopes to convert.

According to lead analyst Andrew Uerkwitz, about 62% of the 380 Netflix password borrowers surveyed said they would stop using Netflix once the crackdown takes effect.

Only 10% of those polled said they would move to create their own account for $9.99 a month, hinting password borrowers don’t see enough value in the platform. The survey also suggested competitors could greatly benefit from Netflix’s crackdown.

Some 35% of respondents said they can replace Netflix with another service, while another 31% added they don’t enjoy the content enough to justify paying for it.

When asked which platforms users would use more frequently if they eliminated Netflix, the top streaming alternatives included Amazon Prime Video (42%), Hulu (35%), and Disney+ (26%).

In its quarterly letter to shareholders published last month, Netflix said it would be intensifying its push to combat password sharing in Q1, although the streamer did not provide details on when exactly that would occur and what countries would be impacted.

“Later in Q1, we expect to start rolling out paid sharing more broadly. Today’s widespread account sharing (100M+ households) undermines our long term ability to invest in and improve Netflix, as well as build our business,” the company wrote.

Netflix’s password crackdown, coupled with its recently launched ad-supported tier, have been looked at as meaningful profitability drivers, especially as competition within the streaming space escalates: “As always, our north stars remain pleasing our members and building even greater profitability over time.”

Netflix reported subscriber net additions of 7.66 million in Q4, above company guidance for 4.5 million amid a slew of high-profile and record-breaking content releases, including “Glass Onion,” “Troll,” “All Quiet on the Western Front,” “My Name is Vendetta,” and “Wednesday.”

“The bottom line is there’s a massive amount of password sharing, particularly among affluent people,” told Jason Helfstein, head of internet research at Oppenheimer.

“We do think a good chunk of [Netflix] subscribers will probably pay more to keep certain members of their household, or let’s say their children who no longer live with them, on their plan,” he continued.

Helfstein, who described the crackdown as a “net positive” in the long term, added Netflix, “would not be doing this if they thought they would end up in a worse revenue situation.”

“This is a company that historically has prided itself on customer service, above all,” Helfstein said.

“The reality is people have taken advantage of it. Sharing your Netflix account with 20 other people is probably not what the company had in mind, [but] if people are reasonable and share this with five, six people in their family? I think it’s going to work out.”

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Takeover News: February Opens With M&A Bang As Gold Miners, REITs Pitch $28 Billion In Deals

Mergers and acquisitions may be exiting their recent slump with multiple takeover deals suddenly making news. Public Storage (PSA) made an $11 billion bid for Life Storage (LSI) on Sunday. Also Sunday, gold miner Newmont (NEM) offered $16.9 billion for smaller competitor Newcrest Mining (NCMGY). Meanwhile, shares of drug components supplier Catalent (CTLT) spiked 19.5% Monday on murmurs of an acquisition by Danaher (DHR).

The proposals come as deal making fell starkly last year. Worldwide, mergers and acquisitions totaled $3.6 trillion in 2022, down 38.8% from 2021, according to markets research firm Dealogic. And fourth quarter takeover volume came in at $538 million. That was the lowest Q4 level since 2017, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Law.

Public Storage Takeover

Public Storage, the largest American self-storage property company, proffered an $11 billion all-stock bid for Life Storage after it denied previous takeover offers, Reuters reported. According to terms of the deal, Life Storage shareholders would receive 0.4192 shares of Public Storage stock for each LSI stock they own. That would equal $129.30 per share based on PSA stock’s closing price on Friday. And it represents a 19% premium based on 20-day volume-weighted average price of both stocks. Including debt, the deal would value Life Storage at $15 billion.

Glendale, Calif.-based Public Storage first approached Life Storage in December. It had an initial bid rejected in January, the company said in a statement. Both companies are real estate investment trusts (REITs). That tax-sheltered business model return unused cash flow to investors via payouts.

Life Storage currently yields 4.1%. Public Storage yields 2.6%.

In a separate statement, Life Storage said the public proposal is “substantially similar in all material respects,” to the previous deal that was denied. The company plans to review the proposal to determine the best course of action for shareholders. It advises shareholders not to take any action at this time.

Last year, REITs had $83 billion in merger and acquisition volume, making it the second-best year for the sector since 2007, according to the National Association of REITs.

PSA stock dipped 0.3% Monday while LSI stock jumped more than 11% following the news.

Newmont, Newcrest Mining

On Monday, Colorado-based gold miner Newmont made a $16.9 billion all-stock offer to buy Australia-based competitor Newcrest Mining. Newmont is the world’s largest gold producer by market value and ounce production.

Under terms of the deal, Newcrest shareholders would receive 0.38 Newmont share for each Newcrest stock share they own. That would result in the combined company being 70% owned by Newmont and 30% owned by Newcrest, Newmont stated in a new release. And the current offer price of $27.16 per Newcrest share would represent a 21% premium based on Newcrest’s Friday closing price of $22.45 per share.

“The proposed transaction would join industry-leading portfolios of assets and projects to create long-term value across the combined global business, and we welcome the consideration of Newcrest’s Board of Directors,” Newmont CEO Tom Palmer said in the announcement.

Takeover Bid Comes Amid Bobbing Gold Price

On Monday, Newcrest Mining confirmed that the offer followed a previously rejected proposal of 0.363 Newmont shares for each Newcrest stock share. However, Newcrest’s board of directors didn’t believe it delivered enough value to shareholders. Newcrest is considering Newmont’s latest proposal and advised shareholders to not take any action at this time.

The takeover attempt occurs as the price of gold bobs beneath an early February high. Spot gold prices rose to $1,953 per ounce on Feb. 1, it’s highest since April 21 last year when it traded at $1,951, according to data from metals dealer Scottsdale Bullion & Coin. Gold prices are currently hanging around $1,873 per ounce, but still well above November lows of $1,629. Bank of America projects it will reach $2,000 by the third quarter. JPMorgan and UBS Bank are a bit more bearish, projecting gold prices to reach $1,860 and $1,900 by the fourth quarter and end of year, respectively.

NEM stock slid 4.5% Monday while NCMGY stock rose about 12% following the news.

Catalent Chatter

Also on Monday, Catalent shares soared after Bloomberg reported that life sciences company Danaher is considering a takeover attempt. Those familiar with the matter say the deal is not imminent, and the companies have yet to comment publicly on the reports. Still, CTLT stock soared 19.5% by market close Monday after leaping 24% early in the day. DHR stock dipped 2.3% on the day.

Source: investors.com

Binance to Suspend US Dollar Transfers Using Bank Accounts

Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, said it’s temporarily suspending deposits and withdrawals of US dollars using bank accounts, and will work to restart the service soon.

The suspension will start Wednesday, according to a Binance spokesperson. No specific reason was given for the suspension. Bank transfers using other fiat currencies, such as euros, are unaffected, the representative said.

“It’s worth noting that only 0.01% of our monthly active users leverage USD bank transfers, but that we are working hard to restart service as soon as possible,” the spokesperson said in an emailed statement. Other methods of buying and selling crypto on Binance, such as via credit card, Google Pay and Apple Pay, “remain unaffected.”

Binance US, a separate entity designed for US users, said it’s not affected by the move.

Crypto companies have had difficulties finding banking partners to facilitate the sending of money to buy and sell digital assets. Following the collapse of FTX, banks have been warned by federal regulators of the risks of doing business with crypto firms.

While some banks are “withdrawing support for crypto, other banks are moving in,” Binance Chief Executive Officer Changpeng Zhao said on Twitter in response to the Binance announcement. “Some setbacks were expected from last year’s incidents.”

Last month, Binance said its banking partner Signature Bank would handle user transactions only if they’re for more than $100,000 as the lender decreases its exposure to digital-asset markets. The New York-based bank said in December it intends to cut as much as $10 billion in deposits from crypto clients.

A spokesperson for Signature said Monday that the bank can’t comment on client-related matters.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

2 Industrial Stocks To Buy Hand Over Fist in February

These stocks will generate steady earnings and pay out dividends for decades to come.

Inflation rocked the U.S. economy in 2022. Rising prices across the board led to higher costs for consumer products. But one company’s cost is another’s revenue, and in the cases of rising commodity, energy, and agricultural prices, plenty of sectors benefited from these trends last year.

The industrial sector is a good hunting ground for stocks that will benefit from rising inflation, specifically with railroads and defense contractors. Here is one railroad and one defense contractor with durable earnings streams to buy in February.

1.Lockheed Martin: one reliable customer

Lockheed Martin (LMT 1.37%) has been a mainstay of the defense industry for decades, becoming one of the largest customers for the U.S. government and its allies. It supplies missiles, helicopters, satellite systems, fighter jets, and many other products for war departments. Some of the company’s revenue comes from cost-plus contracting, which gives contractors like Lockheed Martin a guaranteed return on projects. These kinds of contracts are part of the reason why the company can ride through periods when wages and input costs are rising quickly, as is happening today. And even if cost-plus contracting goes away, Lockheed is still the sole supplier for many weapons systems like the cutting-edge F-35 fighter jet. Regardless of the contract structure, Lockheed will likely be a monopoly supplier to the U.S. government for decades to come.

With governments — especially the U.S. government — always wanting the latest in defense/war technologies, Lockheed has an incredibly steady and predictable business. Last year, it generated $66 billion in sales and $6.1 billion in free cash flow. More importantly, its backlog grew 11% year over year to $150 billion, a lot of which has been driven by countries wanting to increase their defense spending post the Russian invasion of Ukraine. For example, Finland signed a $9.4 billion deal for the new F-35 fighter jet last year, which will create an earnings stream for many years as the aircraft is deployed and maintained.

Management takes this steady cash flow and returns it to shareholders through dividends and share buybacks. Over the last 10 years, Lockheed’s dividend per share is up 165%, while shares outstanding are down 21%, and its dividend is currently yielding 2.60%. If dividend growth and buybacks continue for the next few decades, shareholders of Lockheed stock will achieve solid long-term returns.

2.Union Pacific Corporation: a durable railroad operator

Railroad company Union Pacific (UNP -0.05%) operates in a different industry from Lockheed Martin but actually has similar competitive advantages helping it consistently generate profits. As one of the only railroad operators throughout the western half of the United States, companies that want to ship items by rail have no choice but to use Union Pacific’s routes. That allows the company to earn steady profits regardless of its input costs, as it can just pass them on to customers.

Over the last 10 years, Union Pacific has grown its free cash flow by 124%, hitting $5.7 billion over the last 12 months. Like Lockheed, Union Pacific consistently returns cash to shareholders in both dividends and repurchases. The dividend per share is up 280%, and shares outstanding are down 34.5% in the last 10 years. Investors currently get a 2.5% dividend yield each year for holding the stock, indicating to me that shares are inexpensive at the moment.

With urban areas spaced widely across a large land mass, railroads have been a shipping mainstay in the United States for over 100 years. I would bet that they will likely stick around for at least another few decades, if not much longer, as the geography of the West Coast is not changing anytime soon. That bodes well for investors looking to buy Union Pacific stock and hold on for many years.

Source: fool.com

Institutional Traders Shifting Attention from Blockchain to AI: JP Morgan

More than half of the institutional traders surveyed by global financial services giant JP Morgan said that artificial intelligence and machine learning will be the most influential technology in shaping the future of trading over the next three years—cited four times more often than blockchain and distributed ledger technology.

JP Morgan’s e-Trading Edit report is now in its seventh year, the latest report drawn from a January survey of 835 institutional traders in 60 global markets. The annual assessment of trader sentiment spans several asset classes and is intended to reveal “upcoming trends and the most hotly debated topics.”

The tumultuous bear market in crypto—coupled with the recent consumer and commercial hype over accessible AI technology like ChatGPT—seems to have shifted the outlook of financial industry professionals. Last year, blockchain and distributed ledger technology tied for second with AI and machine learning with 25 percent of respondents declaring them key to the future. Mobile trading applications came in first, with 29 percent.

Now, AI dwarfs every other major category of technology, its 53% citation rate far and away ahead of API integration (14%) and blockchain (12%). The top 2022 technology, mobile apps, fell to 7%, along with quantum computing and natural language processing.

Why Is Crypto Twitter Obsessed with ChatGPT?

Tackling crypto specifically, JP Morgan found that 72% of traders “have no plans to trade crypto [or] digital coins,” with 14% predicting they plan to trade within five years.

Even so, respondents clearly felt that other players were bullish on the space.

“Crypto and digital coins, commodities, and credit are predicted to have the biggest increases in electronic trading volumes over the next year,” the report notes, with participants predicting 64 percent of their activity will be in the crypto space by 2024.

While the survey found traders were unanimous in their belief that electronic trading will continue to grow, they also expected rough weather ahead. When asked which potential developments will have the greatest impact on the markets in 2023, the top answers were recession risk (30%), inflation (26%), and geopolitical conflict (19%).

The e-Trading Edit report is only the latest of several studies and reports that JP Morgan has released in the past month relating to cryptocurrency and digital assets. Last week, the firm predicted “significant challenges” for Bitcoin and Ethereum and noted that Solana, Terra, and tokens were gaining traction in the world of decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

JP Morgan also looked at the prospects for leading crypto exchange Coinbase last month, saying the upcoming Shanghai update for Ethereum “could usher in a new era of staking” for the firm.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Apple stock gets nailed as CEO Tim Cook spooks investors with one phrase

Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook and his righthand CFO Luca Maestri channeled their inner Wall Street economist on the tech giant’s earnings call late Thursday, and investors aren’t liking it.

Shares of Apple — which had reverted to slightly positive in after-hours trading on upbeat China demand comments on the earnings call — fell more than 3% in pre-market trading on Friday.

The pullback likely reflects a rare earnings miss for Apple, coupled with the fact Cook and Maestri used some variation of the phrase “challenging economy” seven times on the earnings call. Both are unusual for the mighty Apple.

“The macroeconomic environment this past quarter markedly was more challenging than 12 months ago,” Maestri told analysts.

Those challenges could be seen in Apple’s earnings.

Apple Earnings Overview

  • Revenue: $117.1 billion versus $121.1 billion expected
  • Adj. earnings per share: $1.88 versus $1.94 expected
  • iPhone revenue: $65.7 billion versus $68.3 billion expected
  • Mac revenue: $7.7 billion versus $9.72 billion expected
  • iPad revenue: $9.4 billion versus $7.7 billion expected
  • Wearables: $13.4 billion versus $15.3 billion expected
  • Services: $20.7 billion versus $20.4 billion expected
  • Wins: 1) China demand appears to be gaining steam; 2) $50 billion plus in cash on the books; 3) Supply constraints have pretty much ended.
  • Misses: 1) No March quarter revenue guidance again; 2) Executive tone negative on the economy; 3) Weak wearables sales due to economic conditions.

Despite the rare miss and cautious tone from Cook & Co., the bulls on the Street are standing pat on the stock.

The collective vibe is that everyone knew the quarter was going to be soft as the China economy slowly reopens and U.S. consumers spent more cautiously. In turn, Apple’s latest quarter may be as bad as it gets fundamentally for the iPhone and Mac maker this year.

Or so the bulls are betting.

“Bears will be quick to point out negative sales growth but we note when adjusting for FX that sales and outlook are flat, which is materially better than other consumer electronic companies. Importantly services are also outperforming and Apple’s installed base continues to grow (over 2 billion active Apple devices and iPhone installed base estimated at 1.2+ billion),” Citi analyst Jim Suva said in a note to clients.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Alphabet disappoints on sales as ad business slips after pandemic run-up

Alphabet Inc on Thursday posted fourth-quarter profit and sales short of Wall Street expectations as Google’s advertising clients pulled back spending from a period of pandemic-led excess.

Executives of the search and advertising giant adopted a subdued tone on a call with investors, promising an extended period of belt-tightening, particularly on hiring, real estate costs and experimental projects that can take years to reach fruition.

Shares of Alphabet were down nearly 5% in after-hours trading, after losing about 40% of their value in 2022.

“We are committed to investing responsibly with great discipline and defining areas where we can operate more cost- effectively,” Chief Executive Sundar Pichai told analysts on a call to discuss the company’s results. That echoed comments from Meta Platforms Inc boss Mark Zuckerberg the previous day on cost efficiencies.

Shares of other tech companies Apple Inc and Amazon.com Inc also fell after they posted disappointing results on Thursday, wiping off gains after Facebook parent Meta on Wednesday boosted tech shares with news on cost cuts and a large buyback.

Gone was some of the exuberance of the pandemic when consumers flocked to the internet amid lockdowns and heightened interest in e-commerce and touchless deliveries.

Alphabet’s chief financial officer, Ruth Porat, promised a more measured approach for 2023 and a focus on “delivering sustainable financial value,” not necessarily a hallmark of Silicon Valley firms. “We’re focused on revenue upside as well as durable changes to the expense base.”

Advertisers, who contribute the bulk of Alphabet’s sales, have cut their budgets as rising inflation and interest rates fueled concern over consumer spending.

Pichai pointed to advertisers’ more modest spending and the impact of foreign exchange rates abroad as drags on Alphabet’s overall results.

He said artificial intelligence (AI) software will be an important focus for the company and that it plans to make its LaMDA chatbot software publicly available in the coming weeks.

LID ON COSTS

Mountain View, California-based Alphabet decided to cut 12,000 jobs last month, representing about 6% of its overall workforce, and said it was doubling down on AI. Across the company, Alphabet will “meaningfully” slow its pace of hiring this year, said Porat.

Alphabet, long a leader in AI, is facing competition from Microsoft Corp, which is reportedly looking to boost its stake in ChatGPT – a promising chatbot that answers queries with human-like responses.

“Despite being seen as one of the most insulated companies in the advertising space relative to peers, Alphabet’s poor quarter is the latest sign that worsening fundamentals and a tough macroeconomic environment are prompting advertisers to cut back on spending,” said Jesse Cohen, senior analyst at Investing.com.

Net income fell to $13.62 billion, or $1.05 per share, from $20.64 billion, or $1.53 per share, a year earlier. That was the sharpest decline for Alphabet in four quarters.

Adjusted profit of $1.05 per share fell short of an expected $1.18 per share, according to Refinitiv.

Revenue from Google advertising, which includes Search and YouTube, fell 3.6% to $59.04 billion. Total revenue rose 1% to $76.05 billion, its slowest growth ever barring a small decline in the second quarter of 2020. Analysts were expecting $76.53 billion.

Google is the world’s largest digital ad platform by market share, making it uniquely susceptible to fluctuations in online marketing spending. Its YouTube division has faced a surge in rival platforms, particularly TikTok, whose endless scroll of short video is drawing younger users away.

Alphabet’s Porat said the company’s total capital expenses this year will be in line with last year. As more of its employees work remotely and it consolidates staff, Alphabet expects to pare back its real estate expenses, which Porat said would result in a charge of roughly a half-billion dollars in this year’s first three months.

Revenue from YouTube ads, one of Alphabet’s most consistent money-makers, fell nearly 8% to $7.96 billion, well below the estimate of $8.25 billion, according to FactSet.

Cloud was a bright spot, however, with revenue growing 32% to $7.32 billion, but at its slowest pace since the company began disclosing the segment’s revenue numbers.

But there may be more pain ahead for Alphabet. Late last month, the Justice Department and eight states sued Google over what they said were anticompetitive practices in its digital ad sales. The company is facing multiple lawsuits, which, if successful, could cause it to be broken up.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Fed’s interest-rate hikes make T-bills an attractive, safer investment

A short-term saver? Say thanks to the Federal Reserve.

One benefit of the Fed’s interest-rate hikes aimed at wresting control over inflation is that savers looking for a safe investment for a year or less can now get the best yields in ages from Treasury bills, or T-bills.

Savings rates have jumped from just about zero to more than 4% in the past 12 months on these short-term securities issued by the federal government. On Jan. 24, a one-year T-bill was yielding 4.7%, up from a rate of 0.57% a year ago. A six-month T-bill was at 4.82% on Jan. 23, compared with 0.36% last January, and the three-month T-bill was yielding 4.58%, up from 0.13%.

And as long as the Fed keeps interest rates high — which seems likely after Wednesday’s quarter-point hike — investing short-term money in T-bills has a certain drama-free appeal with modest returns.

While this is not a get rich quick scheme, “T-bills currently offer savers better yield than most online savings accounts and short-term [certificates of deposit],” told Ken Tumin, a senior industry analyst at LendingTree and founder of DepositAccounts.com.

What are T-bills

reasury bills — like i Bonds and Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS — are issued by and backed by the U.S. government. I bonds, for example, pay interest for up to 30 years. T-bills are the ticket for people looking for short-term savings of up to a year.

Additionally, savers can reap tax savings on T-bills, which are exempt from state and local income tax.

“That can make a 4.6% yield equivalent to a 5% yield for a CD in a state with an income tax,” Tumin said.

How T-bills works

T-bills are sold at a discount to their face value; when the bill matures, your interest is the difference between what you paid and the T-bill’s face value. For example, if you bought a $1,000, one-year T-bill at a rate of 4%, you would shell out $960 upfront and receive $1,000 at the end of the year.

You must buy on auction dates, which occur weekly for all maturities, except the one-year T-bill, which is set for every four weeks. Most individual investors make a noncompetitive bid, which means you land the average yield set at auction. (Emergency funds might be best held in high-yield savings accounts.)

Want to sell before the maturity date? That can be “a bit of a hassle,” told Tricia Rosen, a financial planner and founder of Access Financial Plannin.

When you buy through TreasuryDirect — the government’s website — you must hold new Treasury marketable securities for at least 45 calendar days before transferring or selling them (even if it’s a four-week security). Interest is paid when the security reaches maturity.

You won’t pay a penalty or fee if you want to hop out early like you would if you withdrew from a CD early. However, you could possibly lose money, if the sale price of the T-bill is lower than the original purchase price, which you are guaranteed at maturity.

“For individual investors, Treasury bills may be better suited as a way to diversify your portfolio rather than a replacement for your emergency savings,” said Greg McBride, senior vice president and chief financial analyst at Bankrate.com. “If you had an unplanned expense and needed to sell prior to maturity, you wouldn’t be able to sell it on TreasuryDirect but would first have to transfer it to a bank, broker, or dealer.”

Where to purchase T-bills

You can buy newly issued Treasuries in terms ranging from four weeks to 52 weeks through your bank or brokerage, which may charge a commission. Or, you can buy them online for a minimum of $100 through the government’s TreasuryDirect program, with no commission.

Large firms, however, such as Charles Schwab, Fidelity, and Vanguard, do not charge a fee when you buy a T-bill. That said, the minimum order for a new-issue Treasury is typically $1,000 in face value when you purchase it via a brokerage. And if you want to purchase T-bills for individual retirement accounts (IRA) accounts, you must go through a broker. For those nearing retirement, these can be a smart place to set aside cash without the worry of what’s going to happen with the stock market.

“T-bills are paying a slightly higher rate than other short-term investments, and the Treasury Direct website is easier to navigate than it was a few months ago before they revamped it,” Rosen said. “So it’s a good idea for someone who is in a high tax state.”

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Car buyers face ‘inhibiting factors’ for EV adoption: Mazda USA CEO

Japanese automaker Mazda (7261.T) has a small, yet cult-like following here in the U.S. While fans of Mazda enjoy the driver-focused characteristics and sporty handling, there is one one area that the company is lagging: electrification.

Though the brand had a strong Q4 in North America—sales jumped around 40% versus a year ago—Mazda saw its overall sales dip around 12% for the year compared to 2021, partly because of supply chain issues. Mazda sold around 295,000 cars in North America last year, highlighting its small brand status in a region where GM (GM) sold nearly 10 times as many cars.

It’s why investing big time into fully electric vehicles has been so hard for Mazda, because of the billions of dollars needed for new platforms. It’s also why Mazda is leaning hard into its hybrid options, like it’s all new flagship SUV, the CX-90.

“So CX-90 launches with our most powerful engine ever in both gasoline mild hybrid and also plug-in hybrid forms – so the platform has only electrified powertrains,” says Mazda North America president & CEO Jeff Guyton in an intervie. “It really represents a big step forward in terms of the premium-ness of the Mazda brand, and we’re bringing that together with a premium experience in our new retail evolution showrooms across the country.”

The CX-90 is a big three-row, premium SUV, and as Guyton mentions, will only have “electrified” powertrains. In a country like the US where EV is growing every year, the question is this: why wasn’t the CX-90 given a fully-electric powertrain?

Guyton says it’s because Mazda’s customers haven’t been asking for that—yet.

“What we see happening right now is that customers are obviously quite interested in the journey of electrification, but there are also inhibiting factors because the customer experience for electric is, let’s say, it has growing pains right now,” Guyton says. “Whether you’re talking about charging, or cold weather, or hot weather, or electricity in California in the summertime, and so forth.”

Mazda currently has only one EV for sale in America, the midsize MX-30 EV which has a paltry 100 mile range, and is only sold in limited quantities in California. Mazda says a hybrid range-extending version of this car is coming out later this year, with the company’s first true EVs slated for 2025-2027 timeframe.

It’s all part of the company’s $10.6 billion investment into EV’s, which does sound like a decent sum of money, but pales in comparison with what giants like GM, Ford (F), and Volkswagen (Vow3.DE) are spending.

Guyton says the company’s plan to delay its EV rollout, and devote funding to hybrid powertrains, is the right answer for the current environment.

“I think there’s a lot of demand, there’s a lot of interest [in EVs], but the technology and the scenery around it in terms of charging and so forth is not really mature yet,” he says. “So we think that the customer experience right now suffers a bit, and that our formula can provide something more timely.”

Speaking of timely: Mazda investors will be hoping Guyton and the management team in Japan are right and haven’t waited too long to begin its EV transformation.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Amazon expected to post first unprofitable year since 2014 and worst loss since the dot-com bust

Holiday earnings will have to greatly exceed expectations for Amazon to reach an annual profit for the year.

Amazon.com Inc. is expected to reveal this week its first unprofitable year since 2014 and the worst year for its bottom line since 2000 — and expectations for this year aren’t headed in a positive direction.

Amazon AMZN, +2.57% reported roughly $3 billion in total losses through the first nine months of the year, and Wall Street analysts on average are projecting about $2 billion in net income in the holiday season, according to FactSet. Beyond being its first annual loss since 2014, a loss of $1 billion or more would challenge for the biggest annual loss on Amazon’s books — the only time it has lost more than $1 billion in a year was a $1.4 billion loss in 2000, when Amazon had less than $3 billion in annual revenue.

Amazon’s losses are driven by Rivian Automotive Inc. RIVN, +7.54%, which Amazon invested in and contracted with for delivery vehicles; the electric-vehicle maker’s stock plunged in 2022 after a successful initial public offering at the end of 2021. Amazon is unlikely to face those paper losses again in future years, and Wall Street projects that Amazon will storm back to more than $17 billion in profit in 2023 by cutting costs and shedding employees it brought on to deal with spiking demand in the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic.

That forecast may be too bright, though, amid growing doubt about Amazon’s most profitable business, Amazon Web Services. While Amazon is not expected to produce a net income this year, its operating income will be in the black solely because of an expected $23 billion profit from AWS, countering an $11 billion loss from the rest of the business.

Cloud-computing growth is slowing, however, as large corporate customers look to cut back on their spending. Last week, Microsoft Corp. MSFT, +2.10% executives revealed that an Azure slowdown that spooked investors in October had gotten worse in December, and that they expected it to continue to get worse this quarter. AWS revenue growth has already decelerated, and many analysts rushed to adjust their projections for Amazon revenue and profit forecasts ahead of Thursday’s guidance from executives.

“Our lower AWS margin forecasts further drag down our Amazon [operating income] estimates and pose some risk to the outlook,” UBS analysts wrote last week in a report that predicted just 15% revenue growth this year for AWS, a slowdown for a business that has more than doubled sales since the end of 2019 to an expected $80 billion this year.

All of this explains the recent corporate cuts at Amazon, which more than doubled its workforce to become the second-largest private U.S. employer during the pandemic. No amount of cutting is expected to return Amazon to the heights it enjoyed in 2020 and 2021 — when the e-commerce and cloud-computing giant produced more than $54 billion in profit collectively, more than in its entire existence to that point — but now those cuts may be the only way to come close to expectations this year.

“A weaker outlook at AWS puts even more pressure on cost cuts at the retail segment to drive the margin story,” UBS analysts bluntly stated, while maintaining a buy rating but cutting their price target to $118 from $121.

It’s still possible for Amazon to exceed expectations, maybe by enough to reach break-even for the year — holiday earnings have beaten estimates at least five years running, according to FactSet records that date to 2017, including a huge beat last year thanks to the Rivian IPO. The direction of the stock likely depends on the forecast, though, and what it says about the direction of profit, and AWS, in 2023.

Source: finance.yahoo.com